This is the proof pixel refresher is NOT damaging your panel. Your panel will NOT become brighter (it might have a minimal, non-noticeable-to-the-human-eye increase which is to be expected after one or a few pixel refresher runs, but no more than that). If it did, your panel would become excessively bright as a consequence of it increasing the pixel voltage too much.ĭon't believe me? Get any OLED panel and run the pixel refresher as many times as you wish. The 2K one is the one you don't want to run too often because the best way to degrade an OLED pixel is to increase the voltage.Īgain, the pixel refresher does NOT increase the pixel voltage more than it needs to. It's a stress test using each TV on their max potential so there's no adjustes to be done, Samsung was the one who created and assured that their TV could handle over 1300 Nits and 6 Hours Timer for Pixel Refresher.Īn Average person don't use their TVs in the same way that a Stress Test does ( i personally don't ), not everyone uses the TV setting the Max Limit for each Specs playing the same static image on the screen ( i don't have a single spec set on 100, my brightness for instance is set for 40 ).įor the results we can see that LG knows better their Screen and the Limits they can reach and dive in with it, while Samsung does not, they failed to deliver as promissed and create an over bright/satured screen having to wait too much for the required pixel refresher timer to start. ![]() The test is done by using the max limit of each TV specs and also respecting their official suggested timer for Pixel Refreshes/Maintenance modes. This ongoing competition between the two electronics giants suggests that their relationship is unlikely to improve anytime soon.The results are not worthless at all because it's not even a competition to begin with, it's a test made for each TV performance individually, the only thing the OP did was to compare the results each TV got. Despite this, LG's WOLED TVs have shown a clear difference in screen burn susceptibility compared to Samsung's QD OLED TVs in Rtings' latest test cycle. Samsung also offers premium LCD TV ranges and argues that Rtings' burn-in tests are not representative of normal TV usage, and that all OLED TVs have countermeasures to minimize screen burn susceptibility. These improvements have helped reduce screen burn and are similar to LG's advancements in screen burn management. In recent years, Samsung has made significant technological advancements in heat management and OLED materials for their second-generation QD OLED TVs. LG Display made this point during an online presentation and then departed from the press call. Therefore, a pure RGB solution is expected to be more susceptible to screen burn than a WOLED one. Screen burn is caused by the 'fatiguing' of specific areas of RGB pixels through prolonged exposure to static image elements. The stress on RGB subpixels in LG's WOLED panels is significantly less than that of QD OLED's RGB subpixels over time. This has been a point of criticism from Samsung towards LG Display over the years, arguing that it does not deliver a pure RGB picture. In addition, LG Display provided an explanation of why its WOLED technology is less susceptible to screen burn than its rival's QD OLED system during the presentation. LG Display has claimed that its WOLED panels are less susceptible to screen burn compared to QD OLED's RGB subpixels due to the use of a white subpixel in their creation. LG Display considers this independent third-party evidence of QD OLED's increased susceptibility to screen burn. The issue was most apparent on Samsung's S95B. However, two TVs that use Samsung Display's QD OLED technology, Samsung's S95B and Sony's A95K, showed signs of image burn-in. The screen shots showed images from LG Electronics' 2022 G2 and C2 OLED TVs, which appeared to be free of any permanent image retention. ![]() LG Display presented screen shots from a well-regarded technology review website, Rtings, on March 2, 2023, which displayed the results of long-term accelerated image retention tests that have been underway since November 16th of the previous year. This comes after Samsung launched its own OLED technology last year, which has given LG Display a chance to retaliate. LG then shifted its focus to attacking Samsung's QD OLED screens for their vulnerability to screen burn, a problem Samsung has often cited as a disadvantage of LG's OLED TVs. The call began with a brief discussion of LG Display's new '3rd-generation' OLED panels that feature micro lens array (MLA) technology, which enhances brightness. LG Display took the opportunity to criticize Samsung's QD OLED screens during an online press call.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |